Note from EC: Today marks our second guest blog post from pitching expert Matt Blake.  I couldn’t agree more with everything he says!

[Cue the annoying, overly excited infomercial salesman voice]

This is the throwing program that you have all been waiting for, it’s the super-duper secret that people haven’t been telling you about 95 mph throwers, and lucky for you, it is now available for F-R-E-E !!(For the first 5 days and then one incredibly low payment of $449 if you do not return the product within those 5 days)…..All you have to do is order the product, follow it for a week and 95mph is a snap of the fingers away, it is just that easy…

Alright, well I can honestly say I just made myself throw up in my mouth a little bit writing that out, and the sad part is that this type of advertising and promotion letters both the baseball and fitness industry. There are two main points that I want to touch on surrounding this type of promotion.

1) Yes, there are some good products out there, I’m not denying that, but I can promise you, anything that is worth having is not free, and does not pretend to be free to lure you in.

2)  There is no single product on the market that is the be-all, end-all in either industry. Eric and I have had this talk many times. Yes, he likes the kettlebell. No, it is not the end of the world. We can keep our squat racks; they still have use. And you know what? Product A may even work better when complemented by Product B.  Whoa, whoa whoa….are you trying to tell me that the kettlebell can be used in a program with dumbbells and barbells? That’s not how this thing was sold to me. Yes, scary thought I know, but let’s think about this for a second. And, I’m going to bring this back to the baseball side of things to avoid really stepping on my tongue.

People ask Eric and me all the time whether or not we like long toss, medicine balls, weighted balls, aggressive velocity drills, lead-up drills, mound work, flat-ground bullpens, etc…and the answer I almost always give is “Yes.”

“Wait, what? I just asked you if you like seven different types of training for pitchers and you gave me one ‘yes.'”

That’s correct, and to take it a step further and really complicate the matters, we even like kettlebells and different squat variations for pitchers among other things.  And we use a ton of different weights of both baseballs and medicine balls.

My perspective on this is that all of these modes of training have an application in building a pitcher capable of throwing the ball 95mph. Obviously, there are some genetic limitations and other factors involved in getting there, but to really optimize the training, I think all of these need to be applied in the right proportions. These proportions would be determined based upon the individual’s current makeup (age, weight, relative strength, mechanical understanding, etc…) and their developmental goals, which should be discussed between player and coach to make sure everyone is on the same page and being realistic.

A great example of this is the throwing program Eric used last winter for Shawn Haviland, a pitcher in the Oakland A’s system that was drafted in the 33rd round in 2008. For Shawn’s particular case, he was a player who pitched in the mid-to-high 80’s with a good feel for pitching. As Eric wrote previously, as good as this is, late round draft picks do not get a lot of leeway to prove themselves and can be released in the blink of an eye. To give Shawn the best chance to succeed, Eric thought it might make sense to be a little more aggressive with his throwing program in an attempt to boost his velocity.

So, aside from the strength training and mobility/flexibility work, throw in some med ball variations, aggressive long toss, a weighted ball program, and some extensive decelerator work and one might think we’re playing with fire here. Well, this season Shawn took his velocity from 87-88 to 90-94.

So, which piece of the puzzle gave Shawn this huge velocity gain? Was it the med ball throws or was it the weighted ball program? Was it the aggressive long toss or the increased strength? I’d like to believe that it was the individual’s commitment to the program in its entirety. Each piece served to complement the next.  This was a program designed for Shawn Haviland to execute in the winter of 2008-2009; that’s it. This same program may not make sense in the winter of 2009/2010. I’m sure some similar pieces will be involved, but in a different context with different proportions depending on where Shawn is in his developmental path. This same program certainly wouldn’t be prescribed to a 15-year-old just learning about pitching mechanics and strength development, and probably would not be prescribed to a 1st round draft pick with a 92-95mph fastball and a million dollar signing bonus hanging over his head. That’s the reality of the situation.

Each case needs to be looked at in its own regard and after deciding on a strategic vision of where the player wants to be, then a comprehensive program would be built with the appropriate drills and exercises to help the player take his game to the desired level.  The X factor in all of this is how much time and effort a player is willing to commit to becoming a better player, because this ultimately determines where the player will end up.

In the end, this all relates back to the first thought in this blog: there is no one single be-all, end-all answer for pitching development. There are modes of training that should be considered and blended to come up with the right recipe for the particular individual.  Yes, there will be crossovers for players at similar points in their development because we have a finite number of training applications, but they would be applied based on reason.

So, before you jump at the next best gadget that is going to give you the 95mph arm you have been looking to buy, make yourself an informed consumer and do some active research to get multiple viewpoints. Believe me, the same product/program that claims to have given someone 95mph, probably has someone claiming that it ruined their arm. I would go as far as to say that neither of these claims are right in their entirety and that there are a lot of external factors involved, but it is your job to do the homework and decide for yourself.

Matt Blake can be reached at mablak07@gmail.com.

Sign-up Today for our FREE Baseball Newsletter and Receive a Copy of the Exact Stretches
used by Cressey Performance Pitchers after they Throw!

Name
Email