Home Baseball Content How Can Pitchers Ever Be “Elite” If They Take Time Off from Throwing?

How Can Pitchers Ever Be “Elite” If They Take Time Off from Throwing?

Written on October 1, 2014 at 8:42 am, by Eric Cressey

The other day, the following comment/question was posted as a reply to one of my articles:

"How does an elite pitcher take 2-3 months off from throwing and stay an elite pitcher? I can see shutting down for one month from any throwing, but any more than that and atrophy and loss of neuro patterns kick in."

The short answer is, "They just can - and have - for a long time." I absolutely appreciate the question, and think it's an excellent one. Unfortunately, high level throwers have shown time and time again that they can do it. I'll give you a few examples among Cressey Sports Performance guys from the 2014 season.

Corey Kluber (Indians) made his last appearance of 2013 on September 27, and he didn't start his off-season throwing program until December 9. According to FanGraphs, his average fastball velocity was up from 92.9mph in 2013 to 93.2mph in 2014 - in spite of the fact that he threw 235 innings in 2014, which was 47 more than he's ever thrown in his career. Corey's saw his average fastball velocity increase in each of his four seasons in the big leagues - and he took 2-3 months off from throwing in each of those off-seasons. Clearly, the time off didn't hurt him, as he won the American League Cy Young in 2014.

Sam Dyson (then Marlins, now Rangers) made his last appearance of 2013 on September 22, and also didn't start a throwing program until mid-December. Check out his FanGraphs velocity improvement from 2013 to 2014 "in spite of" his lengthy time off in the fall/winter.

dysonvelo

Corey and Sam are just a few examples, and I've got dozens more. Elite pitchers don't struggle to stay elite; in fact, time off from throwing allows them to recharge and get their strength and mobility back to prepare for becoming "more elite" in the subsequent season.

With that point made, there are three perspectives I think are important to consider on this front.

1. Health vs. Mechanics

As I've written previously in 7 Reasons Pitchers Shouldn't Do Year-Round Throwing Programs - Part 1 and Part 2, there are a lot of physical adaptations that simply can't happen (at least not optimally) when an athlete is still throwing. You can't regain passive stiffness of the anterior shoulder capsule or ulnar collateral ligament. You can't make significant improvements to elbow and shoulder range-of-motion. You can't get rotator cuff strength/timing up, or improve scapular control. Trying to fix these things when a guy is always in-season is like trying to teach a 16-year-old to drive in the middle of the Daytona 500; things might get a little better, but don't expect great results when stressful situations are still in play.

Conversely, we can't optimize mechanics if a pitcher isn't throwing; we know that. However, I'd argue that having a healthy, strong, powerful, and mobile athlete is an important prerequisite to learning correct mechanics. Most players are really tired at this time of year - even if they don't appreciate it (more on this later). Motor learning never happens optimally under conditions of fatigue. I'm all for aggressive throwing programs and meticulous video analysis, but if mechanics and throwing programs are the only tools you have in your toolbox, then you're like a carpenter who only has a hammer: everything looks like a nail. If you understand structure, function, and adaptation, though, you've got a many resources at your fingertips to make an athlete better - and do so safely.

ECCishek

2. The Psychological Component

An example likely best illustrates this point. I recently saw a minor league pitcher who had an outstanding season: an ERA under 3.00 and a career high of 170+ innings. You'd think a guy like that would be wildly enthusiastic about baseball after such an awesome season, and even want to continue playing in any way possible.

That wasn't the case, though. He told me that for the first five days after the season, he avoided everything baseball. In fact, he was so worn out on baseball that he didn't do anything except watch TV and relax for two days. Only after that did he even feel like going for walks with his girlfriend - and he just started up his off-season training three weeks later. This is not uncommon.

It might come as a surprise, but a lot of players are completely "over" baseball by this time of year, particularly if they played for a team that wasn't in a playoff race, or pitched a career high in innings. Forcing them to continue throwing is a quick way to make them really apathetic to baseball and your coaching. If you need proof, ask any minor leaguer how he feels about being sent to Instructional League. A lot of necessary work happens there, but that doesn't mean they enjoy it.

3. Athletes might not know the difference between feeling "good" and "bad."

I'd argue that there are a lot of pitchers who say they feel great at the end of the season, but actually present really poorly in their post-season evaluations. I think a big part of the problem is that we can't necessarily perceive the issues - mobility and stability deficits - that lead to baseball injuries on a daily basis, as most arm injuries involve mechanical pain. In other words, they usually don't hurt unless you're throwing. I've seen athletes who claim they feel awesome at the end of the season, but they actually have experienced big losses in range of motion, stability, and power.

To apply this to kids who play year-round baseball, I think it's safe to say that we have a generation of kids who legitimately have no idea what it's like to feel good/fresh. They've never thrown a baseball with excellent rotator cuff strength or full scapular upward rotation. They don't know how to effectively create separation because their hip and thoracic mobility is so subpar, and even if they actually had good mobility, their poor core control wouldn't allow them to make use of it. You could make the argument that it's a "subclinical epidemic;" we just have a lot of "unathletic athletes" who aren't willing to take a step back to set themselves up for many steps forward. Build a big foundation and stay healthy, and you'll always pick up the specific mechanics corrections much easier.

Wrap-up

This article was a long response that could have been summed up with the sentence, "Don't be afraid to take time off from throwing." The research is very much in support of it helping to keep pitchers healthy, but the anecdotal evidence also supports the notion that it supports the long-term baseball development process, too.

Are you an athlete looking to learn more about Cressey Sports Performance's services at our Hudson, MA or Jupiter, FL locations? Check out www.CresseySportsPerformance.com.

Sign-up Today for our FREE Baseball Newsletter and Receive Instant Access to a 47-minute Presentation from Eric Cressey on Individualizing the Management of Overhead Athletes!

Name
Email

15 Responses to “How Can Pitchers Ever Be “Elite” If They Take Time Off from Throwing?”

  1. Joseph Says:

    What about the non-elite pitcher? Does the same rule apply then or is it different for each person?

  2. Dan Sherman Says:

    Eric:

    Great post. As a former baseball pitcher and 30+year coach, I especially concur with point #2. Many modern HS coaches (of all sports) would be wise to recognize the need for athletes to re-charge/decompress after excessive time with one sport, AS WELL AS NOT OVERWHELMING TEENAGE ATHLETES IN THE SUMMER.

    Dan Sherman
    Valparaiso, IN

  3. Noel Piepgrass Says:

    Eric-

    This is so helpful. I’m sharing it with everyone in my circle. Hopefully the data that you supplied is enough to give people the courage to take some time off and focus on other things. I say courage, not to challenge people or call them sissies, but because I think it does take a bunch of courage to do less in a baseball culture that is telling them to do more with all the year round academies, travel ball, and fall showcases. As a parent, it’s scary to make that decision to step back, when everyone else seems to be stepping in. It’s more culturally acceptable to participate in “the grind” or the “more is better” mindset. Thanks.

  4. Meyer Says:

    Hi Eric,

    Great timing on the article as I had a parent ask me this question the other day.

    Normally I would have said take from mid October to first week of January. However, working with young kids I’ve noticed that when we start up again in January all the gains and mechanical efficiencies that were corrected over the course of the season and in the fall have been lost. As a result, we’re spending another 2 to 3 months to correct. As well, morale wise the player/players are discouraged and feel they

  5. Meyer Says:

    Have regressed.

    In this case I recommended to the dad to take 2 weeks off at Christmas and New Years. I will forward your article to the dad and have him read it.

    Though I am wondering your thoughts on the two weeks? Is it sufficient?

    The player in question is 13 years old and lives in Ontario, Canada.

    Thanks

  6. Mike Scotty Says:

    Eric –

    I’ve followed your site for over 3 years. I pay special attention to your advice on both shoulder “health” and youth athletic training. Neither of my children are baseball players, but, like your former self, tennis players. Given this article, what advice would you have about shoulder health, regarding rest, strength, flexibility, etc. for tennis players, with no “off-season”? Thank you for your input.

  7. Eric Cressey Says:

    Joseph,

    I think it applies even moreso, as they are skeletally immature and need the time off to build the broader movement foundation.

  8. Eric Cressey Says:

    Hi Mike,

    I think it’s equally important. The forces on the shoulder and elbow are dramatically lower during the tennis serve as compared to the baseball pitch, but the volume is higher. Players serve a lot more than pitchers throw.

    I think 6-8 weeks off from tennis is perfectly fine – and advantageous. Kids need exposures to other sports.

  9. Eric Cressey Says:

    Meyer,

    I don’t feel like two weeks is sufficient, unfortunately. It’s not enough time to regain passive stiffness, let alone acquire other motor skills that build a broader foundation.

  10. mike Says:

    Eric,
    Great article. Question I have is what about a kid in HS ball whose team has a year round throwing program? Mine is 1/3 of the way into a three month break from the mound. First year he’s sat out fall ball but really needs the rest. Throws are getting much stronger since he got off the mound & he says arm feels great. Can’t avoid not throwing on a regular basis. Under the circumstances do you see a danger in throwing year round if he’s taking the break from pitching?
    Thanks,
    Mike

  11. Eric Cressey Says:

    Mike,

    It’s better than taking no time off at all, but I still think it’s a fundamentally flawed system. Time off is time off. You have to remember that everyone feels great…until they don’t. Kids can’t perceive when they’ve deteriorated physically.

  12. jason cole Says:

    One word. GYM

  13. Wayne Wollesen Says:

    I apologize because I know this doesn’t really have anything to do with this post, but how about your boy Tim Collins last night! As a Royals fan and a Cressey fan I’ve always loved Timmy, so it was good to see him come in last night in that situation and do so well.

  14. Gary Donatella Says:

    Keep the articles coming. Been reading your information for at least 6 years now using many things with my sons. Thx.Love when my email box has a Cressey Performance subject to read. Wish I lived near one of your locations to have my younger son train with your staff.

  15. Eric Cressey Says:

    Freddy,

    I’d say that it’s even easier in the Northeast! The weather forces shutdown. I think the six weeks is plenty. Most high school QBs can shut down at Thanksgiving and then pick up the baseball January 1 and be good to go.


LEARN HOW TO DEADLIFT
  • Avoid the most common deadlifting mistakes
  • 9 - minute instructional video
  • 3 part follow up series