Just a quick blog announcement today for those of you who are in New England - or are motivated enough to travel to watch some good boxing.
CP athlete Danny O'Connor looks to take his professional record to 7-0 this Saturday night at The Roxy in Boston when he fights on a great card. There will be loads of CP athletes in attendance, and I'd encourage you to check it out and show Danny some love. For more information, check out Cappiello Promotions.
Rethinking Interval Training
I love interval training, but one of the problems we commonly run into - particularly if someone isn't prepared physically to sprint, or doesn't have a place to do it because of weather restrictions - is that repetitive, low-amplitude motions are our only options. In other words, it has to just be cycling, elliptical, or stairclimber. While slideboard work, medicine ball medleys, barbell complexes, and sled pushing definitely help to work around these problems, when it comes down to it, many of them still don't give certain folks the variety they need in their exercise programming.
In our Building the Efficient Athlete seminar, Mike Robertson and I spoke about the law of repetitive motion: I = NF/AR
In this equation, injury equals the number of repetitions multiplied by the frequency of those repetitions, divided by the amplitude of each repetition times the rest interval. While you can attack each of these five factors differently (and I will in a future newsletter), the take-home point with respect to today's discussion is that simply increasing the amplitude - or range-of-motion - in one's daily life can reduce (or eliminate) the presence or severity of overuse conditions.
For that reason, I often substitute one or both of two different training modalities for client's interval training.
The first is dynamic flexibility circuits with little to no rest between sets. In this scenario, we program 2-3 different mobility/activation drills for each inefficiency the athlete displays, and then combine them in a series of drills. Ideally, as many of these drills are done in the standing position as possible. Let's say a client has poor thoracic spine mobility, a horrific Thomas test, bad glute function, and poor hip external rotation. Here's what his circuit might look like:
a) 1-leg supine bridge
b) wall hip flexor mobilizations
c) 3-point extension-rotations
d) cradle walks
e) overhead lunge walks
f) walking spiderman with overhead reach
g) yoga push-ups
h) 1-leg SLDL walks
(you can find videos of many of these exercises in the Assess and Correct DVD set, and I'll have more information on the rest down the road)
Is this circuit going to completely "gas" an athlete? Absolutely not. However, it is going to make him/her better in light of the inefficiencies I outlined above - and you don't have to leave the gym exhausted to have improved.
The second option is to simply take a series of resistance training exercises with a corrective emphasis (sometimes integrates with the drills outlined above) and put them in a series of supersets. For these exercises, the load utilized should only be about 30% of 1-rep max. I outlined this option a while back in my article, Cardio Confusion. Here's an example I used with an online consulting client recently:
A1) Overhead broomstick walking Lunges (3x10/side)
A2) Push-ups (3x12)
B1) Face pulls (3x15)
B2) Body weight only reverse lunges (3x10/side)
C1) 1-leg SLDL Walk (2x6/side)
C2) Band external rotations - arm adducted (2x15/side)
D1) Behind-the-neck band pullaparts (2x15)
D2) Bowler Squats (2x10/side)
This series is preceded by foam rolling and a dynamic flexibility warm-up, and can be followed by more "traditional" interval training.
Like I said earlier, I'm still all for both traditional and non-traditional interval training. Initiative like I outlined above, though, can serve as a nice change of pace and work in corrective exercise while keeping the heart rate up. Be as creative as you'd like and you'll see great results; the sky is the limit in terms of the combinations you can use.
Enter your email below to subscribe to our FREE newsletter:
I got back late from Easter and pulled a blog together at the last minute on Monday morning - hoping to just kick the can down the road to a big Tuesday night blog (was out of town all day Tuesday). I think the Doga piece satisfied the comedic interests of you, the readers, but I'm afraid it was a little light on the content.
So, my goal for Wednesday was to come through with some crazy geeky content, but I just didn't get much quality time on the laptop - and the project was kicked back to this morning. I started writing some sweet content, but it just kept stretching on and on and on - to the point that it was too long to be a blog. So, that'll be my newsletter early next week. Subscribe to the right of the screen if you want to read it.
That said, I just devoted about 45 minutes to writing, and I still have no blog for Thursday. So, I'm going to cut my losses, brainstorm for Friday, and give you the best filler content I can think up in the meantime for today.
First, I'm going to encourage you to check out this Precision Nutrition Athlete Profile on Cressey Performance Athlete and Oakland A's minor league pitcher Shawn Haviland. Shawn completely changed his body this off-season and had a nice velocity jump from 87-89 to 91-93mph - and he's off to a good start for the Kane County Cougars. He's got a nice blog rolling, too: Ivy League to MLB.
Second, I've got a little challenge for you. One of CP's newest high-level athlete additions is Danny O'Connor, a boxer who was a member of the 2008 US Olympic Team. Danny has turned pro since the Olympics, compiling a record of 5-0 with 3 knockouts, and we're currently in the process of preparing him for his fight on April 25 at Foxwoods (shown on Showtime, for those interested). This kid enters the gym and instantly, everyone gets fired up to train.
Here's the thing, though: Danny might be the only professional boxer in history without a nickname. Nobody's come up with something good enough yet, he says. I suggested "135 Pounds of Irish Fury," but he didn't seem to go for it. So, let's see if my readers can do better than I did. What do you suggest for a nickname? Post your suggestions as comments on this blog.
